MusicaSacra.com | Church Music Association of America: February 2006

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Chant and Polyphony in Alabama

The St. Cecilia workshop this last weekend went extremely well, with nearly 100 people coming from all over to learn chant and polyphony under the direction of Scott Turkington. Here is a full report.

Monday, February 27, 2006

Newman, forty years after Vatican II

John Henry Newman's Anglican difficulties (AD) is a series of twelve lectures delivered in 1850 to Newman's former colleagues in the Oxford movement. The movement began, nominally, in 1833.Newman, at first a member of the movement, converted to the roman church in 1845. Newman acknowledges in the preface to the printed lectures that "conversion is a simple work of divine grace." He then states that his lectures are meant to address the intellectual reservations which might prevent one from following through with entering the roman church once the converted conscience realizes the nature of the church and the necessity of membership in it.

The first seven lectures explain why the adherents of the movement have no place, and can have no place, in the Church of England, but only in the Church of Rome.The last five address superficial, but pervasive, aspects of the Church of Rome that might lead some to deny its identity with the church which our Lord founded.

In my recent reading of AD I was struck by the currency and universality of Newman's arguments.Take these lectures, addressing a specific situation at a specific time, generalize a few terms, and you have a compelling treatment of why no movement, denomination, or sect can ever claim to be the Church of Christ while remaining out of communion with the true embodiment of the same in the roman church.

The lectures can be applied in a special way to the situation within the church today.

We have in the church today a rift, a gap, a splitting into parties, a divide between those on the one hand who see the church of today as continuous with the church of all time, and those on the other who see a new church, or a radically changed church, as emerging within our time. Some have said that we have a de facto schism in the church. Even Pope Ratzinger went so far, on the 22nd of December last, as to use words like discontinuity, rupture, fracture in discussing the dangers the church faces from a wrong understanding of the last ecumenical council. We have two ways, or two broad confluences of ways, of "being church", which ways clash as adherents of both try to be church in one church.

Newman saw a similar pattern in his time as the Oxford movement attempted to be church, to be "true church", while remaining within the english denomination and without the roman obedience. The movement, he said, was foreign to the nature of the national church; its life was not derived from that of the national church; it had no future in the national church. His most forceful expression of the misfit used biological terms:

We know that it is the property of life to be impatient of any foreign substance in the body to which it belongs. It will be sovereign in its own domain, and it conflicts with what it cannot assimilate into itself, and is irritated and disordered till it has expelled it. Such expulsion, then, is, emphatically, a test of uncongeniality, for it shows that the substance ejected, not only is not one with the body that rejects it, but cannot be made one with it; that its introduction is not only useless, or superfluous, or adventitious, but that it is intolerable. (II,6)

There is an ironic difference, however, between Newman's subject and the situation of the church today. Newman was writing of a movement trying to inject catholic elements into a national and essentially protestant denomination, and finding itself repulsed as a substance foreign to the body in which it found itself. In today's church, since the council it has all too often seemed that adherents of the true faith, the faith of the twenty-first century and the fourteenth and the sixth, fifth, and first, have found themselves cast as a foreign substance in the body of the church, while some other life, impatient of that substance, seemed to possess the body.

Finally, though, forty years after the council, we see the notion of a new church, a church of discontinuity, coming to an end. The table is being turned. There is a new pope in Rome and a new wind in the church. The true interpretation of the council, which Pope Ratzinger says has all this time been quietly growing beneath the turmoil of false interpretation, is beginning to be dominant. The "new church", in fact, is finding itself the foreign substance in the body of the true and continuous church, a substance which that true church cannot tolerate, will ultimately expel, for it is not one with the body and cannot be made one with it.

Lex orandi lex credendi; and what is liturgical song, if not prayer? Over these forty years, innovations in liturgy and liturgical music have been the most salient evidences of the true church vs new church conflict. As the new wind continues to blow, we may expect to see the dust and chaff of this period blown away, as good liturgical music, new and old, resumes its rightful place in a truly reformed liturgy and truly renewed church.

These comments hardly begin to touch the depth and scope of AD. AD is not easy reading, but it is nevertheless compelling reading, and delightful, too, and still quite alive at 155. Lent is upon us. AD would make mighty good lenten reading.

Saturday, February 25, 2006

Hymns are Hard to Write


By Sir Richard Terry, Mus. Doc.

"HOW can one explain to the average person the difference between a good and a bad tune?"

To a cultured person the issue is so simple that an answer is hardly required; he knows. But to the average man (timid about his own critical faculty) the answer is not so easy, since it all depends on the angle from which you approach the subject; e. g., its melody, its harmony, its rhythm, its balance of phrase, or (most debatable of all) its aesthetic or devotional appeal.

Five Essentials

Firstly then: If the melody is strongly and clearly defined, free from triviality, banality or trite cliches; if it is readily picked up by a congregation without a note of its harmony being played, it is (other things being equal) a good tune. If on the contrary its melody is weak and sentimental, if it is reminiscent of the "drawing-room song" (as too many 19th century hymn tunes are), if its intervals are awkward (necessitating the use of an instrument to make them intelligible), if a congregation finds difficulty in "picking up" the melody from merely hearing it sung (unaccompanied) by a single voice then it is a bad, or at best, an unsuitable tune.

Secondly: If the vocal harmonies or the organ accompaniments are bold, straight-forward and diatonic, it is good. If they are meretricious, "sugary" or sensuous, it is bad.

Thirdly: If its rhythms are broad and dignified and free from that form of vulgarity known as "patter", it is good. If they are jerky, "jumpy", square-cut or vague or rambling, it is bad.

Fourthly: If its phrases are ill-balanced, it is not a good tune. This point is not so easy to demonstrate in print; it is quite easy if one has a pianoforte with which to illustrate it. With a pianoforte one can demonstrate to the most indifferently-musical audience how phrases can be well or how balanced by (a) contrast (b) repetition or (c) rhyme. These three cases may be illustrated respectively (from the "good" point of view) by hymns 206, 4, and 258 in The Westminster Hymnal. A case of ill-balanced phrasing (from the melodic point of view) is that of Dykes' popular tune to the equally popular hymn "The King of Love my Shepherd is." The first and third lines of the melody are very similar but not sufficiently alike to suggest repetition (for the sake of emphasis) or sufficiently unlike to suggest contrast (for the sake of variety); the second and fourth lines are identical save that an additional note is added to line four which just upsets the balance. And so, this tune which opens so beautifully in its first two lines, grows weaker in the third and peters out lamely in the fourth.

Fifthly: In the matter of aesthetic or devotional appeal -- two points so subtle in essence, so real in effect; so unsusceptible to definition, so compelling to the sense -- nothing short of a bulky treatise could do justice to the subject. So much depends on a variety of circumstances and occasions. A tune eminently suitable to one set of circumstances may be quite out of place in another. To take one example: Sullivan wrote a rousing tune (I am aware that highbrows call it "vulgar") to "Onward Christian Soldiers." It fulfills the idea of soldiers on the march and from that point of view it is inspiring. But by singing that tune to another hymn of exactly the same metre (e.g., Caswall's "Come ye little children" or -- worse still -- Faber's "Mary dearest Mother" ) the result is grotesque in the first instance and outrageous in the second. And yet it is precisely the same tune. Which only goes to show that tunes intrinsically good in one case may prove shockingly bad in others.

The truth is that, in judging hymn tunes we seem to get "no forrader" for lack of a common denominator to our varying standards.

A hymn tune is such a simple form of musical composition that most people seem to think it must necessarily be an easy one. The reverse is the case. That is why hymn tune composition has such a fascination for the amateur and the dillettante. It is they -- with their half-baked musicianship and their unerring instinct for the second-rate -- who are the greatest obstacle to any progress in the vernacular hymnology. It is they who are the most dogmatic in the way they lay down the law to the musician and the multitude alike. It is they who cling obstinately to a type of tune (with its weak melodies and saccharine harmonies) which was the (mid-Victorian) invention of a non-Catholic religious body and which is now repudiated even by them.

Thoughtful Catholics may reasonably ask why they should be held under the yoke of that deplorable passing fashion when the non-Catholic denomination which gave it birth has shaken that yoke from off its own neck.

These well-meaning and misguided dilettanti would do well to make an historical study of hymnology. They would then find (possibly to their surprise) that it is not sufficient to put a few notes together with pleasing and "correct" harmonies and call the result a hymn tune. A vernacular hymn tune is (I repeat) not an easy thing to write; it is a specially hard one.

A Surprising Feature

Mere musicianship is not necessarily a qualification. That is the "surprise" which I promise the dilettanti who do make a serious study of the subject.

Bach is regarded as the hymn-tune writer par excellence. But how many of our dilettanti are aware that (with a few exceptions) he merely added his glorious harmonies to melodies written by lesser men? Only one of Handel's hymn tunes has survived the test of time. Mozart wrote only two hymn tunes and even they have never had a real vogue. Haydn is known by only one tune, and it is now doubted if the melody was really his. Beethoven had no flair for this form of composition. Mendelssohn's hymns are like those of Bach -- fine harmonisations of other people's melodies.

No, my good and dogmatic dilettanti, the great composers have shown us that the flair for hymn-tune composition is a special one and by no means the possession of even the greatest musician.

What, then, are we going to do about it? Ah, there's the rub! But being an incorrigible optimist I am convinced that we shall soon see daylight if we honestly look for it, and -- having found it -- keep our eyes turned always to the light.

Our present difficulty is the lack of any standard, criterion, touchstone (or whatever you like to call it). At present we have (a) the non-musical person who says he knows nothing of the subject, (b) the dilettante who says he does, and (c) the musician who says that hymn-tune composition is not necessarily a concomitant of musicianship.

Until we get some sort of fusion between these three types of mind, little can result; but I am hopeful still.

If I had the wit of a Bernard Shaw or a Chesterton, I might say something to the effect that when it comes to assessing the values of hymn-tunes there are two classes specially unqualified for the task -- the musical and the unmusical.

Think this over. It is not such a paradox as it looks.

The Caecilia, Vol. 66, No. 11 (December, 1939), pp. 451, 453.
The Universe (1933)

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Cause for Beatification of Dom Prosper Gueranger


While on the topic of the Benedictine abbey of Solesmes, it is appropriate to note that the cause for beatification of Dom Prosper Gueranger was introduced on December 21.

Thanks for this information are due to the Web log "Catholics, Musicians, Students, in that order," which also links to the Gonzaga Choir Camp 2006.

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Gregorian Chant Study Week in Solesmes, France


This summer the Ave Maria University Department of Sacred Music will host
its third annual Advanced Gregorian Chant study week at the Abbaye
Saint-Pierre in Solesmes, France. For the week of July 3-7, 2006, attendees
will take part in weekday classes on the performance and history of
Gregorian chant taught by Dom Daniel Saulnier, Director of Paleography at
the abbey and also faculty member of the Pontifical Institute of Sacred
Music. Participants will also be able to hear the chant in liturgical
settings each day as the monks chant the offices of the Liturgy of the Hours
as well as celebrate daily Mass at the abbey.

Tuition for the week is $250 and the class is open to those with some
knowledge of Gregorian chant, especially those who are using chant in
Catholic liturgies or who wish to do so. Attendees are responsible for
making their own arrangements regarding travel and accommodations.
Accommodations are available through the abbey as well as at the local hotel
across the street.

For more information please contact:

Professor Diana Silva
Ave Maria University
1025 Commons Circle
Naples, FL 34119
(239) 280-1652
gregorianchant@avemaria.edu

Adv.%20Chant%20Week.pdf

Monday, February 20, 2006

Alleluia, dulce carmen

Next Sunday, according to the typical calendar, we shall bid farewell to the Alleluia. Daniel Mitsui extensively quotes a description of how this was traditionally done on the Saturday before Septuagesima, a custom continued by the nuns at the Philadelphia Carmel, inter alia, on the Sunday before Lent.

At this time, it would be appropriate to emphasize the alleluia with the organ, whether by a short introduction, accompanying the chant, or an improvisation at an opportune time. It would also be appropriate to sing "Alleluia, song of sweetness" (e.g., Worship #413, The English Hymnal #63) this Sunday, perhaps after Mass. The original translation, following, is public domain, and any "Tantum ergo" melody will do.

Alleluya, song of sweetness,
Voice of joy, eternal lay;
Alleluya is the anthem
Of the choirs in heavenly day,
Which the Angels sing, abiding
In the house of God alway.

Alleluya, thou resoundest,
Salem, mother, ever blest;
Alleluyas without ending,
Fit yon place of gladsome rest;
Exiles we, by Babel's waters,
Sit in bondage and distrest.

Alleluya we deserve not
Here to chant for evermore:
Alleluya our transgressions
Make us for awhile give o'er;
For the holy time is coming,
Bidding us our sins deplore.

Trinity of endless glory,
Hear thy people as they cry;
Grant us all to keep thy Easter
In our home beyond the sky;
There to Thee our Alleluya
Singing everlastingly. Amen.

Trs. J.M. Neale

Sunday, February 19, 2006

The Tyranny of the Ubiquitous Song Leader

Former Episcopalian priest and recent Catholic convert Al Kimel makes observations from the pew. We already know all this, but it is nice to hear it from outside the loft.

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Australian Catholic Hymnal Facsimiles


Jones, Ph.D. Mus.Sac.D., The Rev. Percy, 1914-1992, editor. The Hymnal of Blessed Pius X. Melbourne: Allan & Co., c1952. 126 p.; 18 cm. [Vocal edition.]

Jones, The Rev. Percy, editor. The Hymnal of St. Pius X. Melbourne: Allan & Co., c1952. 121 p.; 31 cm. [Accompaniment edition.]

Moreno, Dom S., O.S.B., 1890-1953. The 'Little Flower' Hymnal: A Collection of 50 Hymns for Church, School and Home. Sydney: Pellegrini & Co., c1933. 31 p.; 21 cm.
Notes: "Melody book with text."
"Engraving plates made from the original manuscripts of the Benedictines of New Norcia"-verso t.p.

Moreno, Dom S., O.S.B. The 'Little Flower' Hymnal: A Collection of 50 Hymns for Church, School and Home. Sydney: Pellegrini & Co., c1933. 23 p.; 30 cm.
Notes: "Organ accompaniment."

The hymnal of the Reverend Doctor Percy Jones (choir director at St. Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 1942-73) is of special interest for its front matter by Father Jones, its unique simplified chant notation, and its simplified chant propers: for example, the Pentecost Introit VI ending with that triple Easter Alleluia.

One further curiosity is that the cover design of the paperback vocal edition is the same as that of The Caecilia in 1943-44 and once again in 1948 ... when the latter was not using its controversial allegorical cover art that inevitably had to be explained inside the review.

Thanks to the Reverend Mark G. Mazza for bringing these resources to my attention. Any reader who has knowledge of the on-line availability of similar facsimiles is encouraged to add to this list.

Sunday, February 12, 2006

Liturgical Music in the Post Vatican II Church

An Interview with Rev. Robert C. Pasley, KHS, by Michael J. Miller. This interview appeared in the January 2006 edition of Catholic World Report.

* * *

Fr. Robert C. Pasley is a priest of the Diocese of Camden, New Jersey, and rector of Mater Ecclesiae Mission, the equivalent of a non-territorial parish, where he celebrates daily Mass and the other Sacraments according to the Traditional Latin Rite. He has been a member of the Latin Liturgy Association for over 25 years and is on the board of directors of the Church Music Association of America. In September 2004 he was installed as a Knight of the Holy Sepulchre.

* * *

Since the mid-1960's, Catholics in North America have witnessed "folk Masses" with acoustical guitars, "polka Masses" with accordion, and "Teen Life Masses" accompanied by amateur rock bands. Did the Second Vatican Council call for this sort of experimentation? What do the conciliar documents actually say about liturgical music?

Fr. Robert Pasley: No, they did not call for this type of music. The documents talk about allowing new compositions in the vernacular. Even before they say that, however, they declare that Gregorian chant has pride of place in the liturgy. They also approve of other works of our heritage, polyphonic choral music especially, which is closest to chant. Even compositions for choir and orchestra are permitted, as long as they don't detract from the Mass and become a performance in themselves.

The most recent official Vatican document on church music was in 1967, Musicam Sacram, and that never mentions anything about rock bands or guitar Masses. It actually sets down priorities as to what parts of the Mass are to be sung. First of all, if anything is sung at the Mass, it should be the opening sign of the cross, the priest's orations, the responses between the priest and the people, the Gospel acclamation, the preface dialogue, the preface and the Holy, Holy, the Lord's Prayer, and the dismissal. The second degree of singing is then added, which is the Kyrie, the Gloria, the Agnus Dei, then the Creed, and the prayer of the faithful. Finally, the third degree of singing is added, and this includes the song at the entrance and communion processions (by song it means the introit and communion of the Roman Gradual, or the Psalms in the Graduale Simplex, or the entrance and communion antiphon found in the Roman Missal), The songs after the readings (the Responsorial Psalm, or the Gradual or Tract from the Graduale Romanum), the Offertory verse from the Graduale Romanum, and the readings, including the Gospel. The document says that if all these things have been accomplished, then hymns may be admitted.

Almost everything mentioned in Musicam Sacram was ignored and the thing that was the exception and [supposed to be] admitted last, the hymn, is the first and only thing that is ever sung. It has brought in all types of secular music and tonality that were never even envisioned.


Isn't it a contradiction to expect Gregorian chant and polyphonic choral music at Mass and at the same time to demand active participation on the part of the congregation?

Fr. Pasley: Well, it depends on what you mean by active participation. The words of the Council have come into English as "active participation", but the [Latin] words are participatio actuosa or "actual participation". When they talk about that, they really are reflecting the mentality of Pius XII as expressed in his encyclical on the liturgy, Mediator Dei [1947]. Mediator Dei says that during the Mass there must be participation of the people, that they're not just passive spectators. That participation, though, is primarily internal and secondarily external.

Even in the traditional Mass there are parts that the people could sing: for instance, the Kyrie. It's Greek, it's very simple: "Lord have mercy, Christ have mercy." There would be nothing for them learn. Then the Sanctus: after a few times they would know what the Latin words mean. The same with the Agnus Dei. Perhaps the Gloria and the Creed would be a little difficult for them to understand at first, but there are two aspects to this: First of all, even in the most recent General Instruction on the Roman Missal, the "GIRM" of 2000, it states that the choir alone may sing the Gloria and the Creed. (I might add, it says that the Creed should be "sung or said" – note the priority.) The choir can sing the long Latin text, while the people can have a refrain. That's an instance of external participation. But more importantly, if the people in the pews have a translation next to the Latin, they can sit there and meditate on those words while the choir – the experts – are singing them. Most people don't have good singing voices and feel funny singing. Oh, they might sing a hymn that they're familiar with, with the support of the organ. But true active participation occurs when they're meditating, using their sense of hearing to listen, their sense of sight in reading, when they're conjoining themselves with the cantors who are trained to sing, when they're lifting their hearts up to God, so that the result is not constant activity, but actual participation. The Second Vatican Council did call for more participation, but I think that they meant more singing of the chant and the introduction of some newer sacred music that would be similar to chant, in the same spirit.


A lot of the Church's most beautiful traditional music was shelved when it became possible to celebrate Mass in the vernacular. How would you explain the hostility to music with Latin texts among some of the clergy even today?

Fr. Pasley: I think that there was a rejection of Latin as a foreign language that people didn't understand, as something too difficult and too challenging.

It was also a symbol of the past. His Holiness, Pope Benedict XVI, when he was Cardinal Ratzinger, wrote a book entitled A New Song for the Lord. In it he asks, what is this opposition that has been set up between post- and pre-Vatican II? It's as though a chasm existed between the two. Really there is supposed to be a continuity, and yet many people look at it as a break. The arch-traditionalists look at it as a break from tradition; the arch-liberals or modern-thinking priests look at it as a break with the past, but it's not supposed to be. Sometimes an ideological mentality was behind this complete rejection of Latin. It was too "formal". We live in an age when everything is supposed to be very communitarian, very informal, with no sense of anyone having separate places; it's all supposed to be common. And so the formality of Latin was viewed as a barrier. In practice, if you get rid of the Latin text and the people are not used to hearing the Latin any more, then you don't do the Latin music any more, because that is even more formal. It is part of the heritage of Western civilization, and many people through the ages have honed this down with great precision. It just doesn't go along with the "Hey, guys, I'm your buddy" mentality of the modern era. [Laughter.]


Again this year on the Feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, you celebrated a Solemn High Mass in the cathedral church of your diocese, with a trained schola cantorum [group of cantors] intoning the proper prayers in Gregorian chant and a choir of professional musicians singing Palestrina. What is the reason for this custom? How do you justify the considerable expense for this magnificent choral Mass?

Fr. Pasley: One day I was talking with the music director at Mater Ecclesiae Mission, and I said, "It's a shame that our chapel is so small; I would love to do a Mass by Haydn or Mozart. I guess we'll never be able to do that." He said, "Why don't we try to have a big choir Mass at the cathedral on a feast day when nothing else is scheduled?" Now the Assumption is a feast when everyone is down at the New Jersey shore to bless the ocean. I also thought that this would be a good way for the parish to show its connection to the diocese, and also for the diocese to recognize that we are a canonical part of it. It would be a Mass of thanksgiving for the establishment of Mater Ecclesiae Mission, and it would be an opportunity to highlight sacred music. So I went to Bishop DiMarzio, the ordinary of Camden Diocese at the time, and he just loved the idea. That was in 2001, and this year we celebrated our fifth annual Solemn Mass of Thanksgiving.

When Mater Ecclesiae Mission was founded, one of our reasons for existing, one of our apostolates, was to foster good liturgical music according to what the Vatican wants. And really, what Vatican II says is not very different from what Pius XII said, except for a little more emphasis on the vernacular; it's pretty much the mainstream of teaching coming from Pius X.

Now I have always loved chant and been involved in church music. And so when I was appointed as rector of Mater Ecclesiae Mission, which formerly was a Latin Mass chapel, I thought that this would be a good vehicle, because Latin is used intensively and therefore we can use the traditional music. We already had people attending who were interested in the chant, so we have our own schola and people in the community who like to join in the singing. But for the choral music, we do put out an expense to hire professional singers.

We feel that our people do give to charity. They give to the Knights of Columbus, who collect food and goods for the poor and the mentally handicapped. We make sure that one of our goals every year is to give generously to the Bishop's charity fund, and we have even exceeded our goal every year that we have participated. We also make sure that we provide money for needs around the parish, janitorial maintenance, material aid to the poor, and so forth. We believe that we have taken care of those duties (we can always do more, everybody can). Yet we feel that in this age, because of the poverty of liturgical music, we need to serve God and serve the Church by making an investment in good liturgical music. The Church spends money on social programs, administration, vestments, architecture and art; I think that it should also put its money into the greatest art, the one that has an integral part in the liturgy, and that is sacred music. All the other arts are auxiliary and help us to worship, but only one art is called an ars integra, something that is part of the liturgy itself, and that is music.


In what other ways does Mater Ecclesiae Mission help to preserve traditional liturgical music?

Fr. Pasley: We have Gregorian chant every Sunday at Mass. We also have a system of getting donations for special feast days throughout the year. We celebrate from 20 to 25 feast days, for example, in the Fall, St. Michael the Archangel, the Feast of the Holy Rosary, Christ the King, All Saints and All Souls Day, Christmas. We make sure that we have special choir Masses for those days. We ask people to give a donation, which we stipulate in the bulletin, to have a choir Mass offered for their intention, and we have musicians come in to sing the Mass.

We have also started a children's Gregorian chant choir, directed by Nicholas Beck, our music director and a recent graduate of Westminster Choir College. About ten young people sing in that choir. We also are about to begin our own adult choir. They have been doing a magnificent job singing hymns at the Low Mass at 9:00 on Sundays, and now they're going to start learning chant and other choral Masses, so that we can use their voices more. We're also building up a liturgical music library. I also hope to make a connection with the great library of sacred music that Msgr. Schuler, at St. Agnes Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, has formed. I'd like to see what we can do to utilize that.


A Tridentine Mass association in Europe called "Juventutem" sent a delegation to the 2005 World Youth Day and celebrated a Traditional Latin Mass in nearby Düsseldorf every day that week. Do you expect the Latin liturgy to flourish during the pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI?

Fr. Pasley: I hope so. So far there have been many good signs. The Holy Father's first speech to the Cardinals after he was elected Pope was in Latin. The Mass of his installation and the earlier funeral Mass of Pope John Paul II were both beautiful, very dignified and very moving. The translation of the body from the Sala Clementina to St. Peter's Basilica was just stunning, with the Miserere and all the chant being sung, so I was really very pleased with that. I know that Benedict XVI has already said that people should know basic prayers in Latin. So I do think that some wonderful things will happen. Again, he has to work against the tide. And yet, just as St. Benedict, the founder of monasticism, started little communities that began to change Europe, I think that there are little communities starting up all over the world that are going to do the same thing.

While he was serving as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger wrote a book entitled The Spirit of the Liturgy. It is less well known that he has written extensively about liturgical music also. Could you tell us something about his teaching on this subject?

Fr. Pasley: I have read The Spirit of the Liturgy, The Ratzinger Report, The Feast of Faith and A New Song for the Lord [other collections of Cardinal Ratzinger's writings], and I guess you could say, in a nutshell, that he is adamantly opposed to the idea that the people have to do everything in order to be participating in the liturgy; he demonstrates that this notion is absolutely wrong and is not what part of what the Council wanted. He explains that the choir can have a ministerial function, representing the people through the talent that they have, through the training that they have received. They can be almost a surrogate that stands in for the people praising God, so that the people can join in with them internally and thus sing praise to God in a way that they would never have been capable of on their own.

That is the thing that struck me the most. The choir is not performing up there, with the people somehow separated from the liturgical action. If the people are entering into the Mass, and the choir is doing their job, then it comes together and it becomes a beautiful combination of all these wonderful things. The people don't say the Eucharistic Prayer of the Roman Canon with the priest. Well, why can't they listen to the choir? Not that the choir would be the only ones to sing; At the solemn Mass of the Assumption at the cathedral, the people sang all the responses, they sang the hymns to raise the roof, but they also have periods to rest and listen.

Another thing that the Pope talks about extensively is the need for silence. In the new liturgy it sometimes seems that you have to add moments of silence by force in order for people to have a chance to think. On the other hand, if the choir is singing traditional sacred music, and the people are listening and joining with them in that way, then they have a time of personal silence, with the choir as a background for their meditation. So choir singing really helps the sense of reverence in the liturgy.

The Holy Father also mentions several practical expedients that he observed at the cathedral in Regensburg, Germany, where his brother Georg was choirmaster for many years. Ratzinger sees no problem, for example, with having the choir sing an elaborate polyphonic setting of the Agnus Dei in its entirety. As a general rule, it is forbidden to keep the priest waiting at the altar until the conclusion of a musical work. His solution is that you sing the first "Lamb of God" at the proper time; then there is a pause, and the priest says, "Behold the Lamb of God…." After that the choir continues the second and third repetitions while the people are coming up for communion.

Pope Benedict also states that sacred music is 'Logocentric.' In other words, it is a servant of the Word. It is a servant and a vehicle that should convey the words of Sacred Scripture and the prayers of the Liturgy, in essence Christ. It's primary purpose is not to provide emotional highs and entertainment, it is not there for us, but it is meant to praise God, then lift ours minds and hearts to Him, then inspire us to let the Word become more incarnate in our souls. That is why Gregorian Chant is liturgical music of the highest caliber. Its purpose is to convey the words of Scripture and thus the Word Himself. So much contemporary music has hardly any content. If it does, what little doctrine is expressed can often be highly questionable, and it is often used to emotionally whip up the troops like a liturgical pep rally. Liturgical music must be 'Logocentric.'


What is the purpose of the Latin Liturgy Association? Who may become a member, and how?

Fr. Pasley: The LLA was founded way back in 1975; purpose was to foster the use of Latin in the liturgy in light of what the Second Vatican Council said, and to give people who love the Latin liturgy the opportunity to come together and discuss the problems and the difficulties and to propose solutions and to support each other. I remember finding out about it when I was a seminarian at St. Charles Seminary in Philadelphia; I joined then and I've been a member ever since. Anyone can become a member. They have a website on the Internet. They send out a beautiful newsletter two or three times a year. There's a general convention that takes place every other year; next year the LLA will meet in St. Louis. There are local chapters of the LLA; the Philadelphia chapter covers our area, Southern New Jersey. Dr. Rudy Masciantonio, the president, is also a member of Mater Ecclesiae.


Traditional-minded Catholics from all over the Tri-State area – New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware – come to Mater Ecclesiae Mission to experience the solemnity and beauty of the liturgy as celebrated there. What do you recommend to those who would like to take some of that music back with them to their own parishes? How does a congregation begin to re-learn to sing in Latin?

Fr. Pasley: A few things. On a practical level, the Catholic Music Association of America has a website www.musicasacra.com. It is becoming a great resource. We have many people throughout the country now who can give conferences at parishes to provide parishioners with some background on this. We have a very large contingent in the Northeast – in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania – so there are plenty of speakers available. The CMAA blog spot is magnificent. A lot of people write in to it with different ideas. Members Jeffrey Tucker and Arlene Oost-Zinner write wonderful articles, and they have a very practical application of all this to their parish in Alabama. That's one thing.

The second thing is: go home and read the Second Vatican Council document on the liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium. Everybody talks about it, and they talk about the spirit of the Council, but you have to read it. When you read it you'll be a little shocked at what's not being done.

Number three, get yourself a copy of Musicam Sacram (1967), which is on the Internet. You can find it at several websites that archive pontifical documents [e.g. ewtn.com]. Read Musicam Sacram. It is extremely important, because it is quoted often in the General Instruction on the Roman Missal.

Finally, try to find someone, not just an amateur but someone who has some knowledge of music, to help you out. And start slowly. People are uncomfortable with change, even when it is good change. They get used to certain things. They are also fearful of things that they don't know about. A lot of people have this idea in their head that Latin is so hard that they will never learn it. I even tell people at Mater Ecclesiae, look when you come here, if this is unfamiliar to you, it's going to take you a month or two to finally begin to feel comfortable and recognize it; then things are going to click and start to fall together.

So, I say, take your time and start small. Perhaps learn some beautiful Kyrie's and start singing those at Mass. Perhaps learn a few Alleluia's that you can sing after communion, if they're too long to sing before the Gospel. Perhaps learn some simple hymns that people haven't heard in years, like Adoro te devote, or Jesu dulcis memoria – beautiful little hymns. And when you do that, make sure that you have a little program that you can pass out to the parishioners with the Latin text on the one side and the translation on the other. People say, "Well how are people supposed to understand when everything's in Latin?" Well, at Mater Ecclesiae there is a missal, and it's in Latin on one side and in English in the other, so they can follow along and pick things up. But if you just sing Latin out of the blue, without any preparation, people are going to turn it off, because they don't understand it, they don't know what's going on. But if you start gently, with simple things, and give them translations so that they can follow along, then they're going to love it.

Friday, February 10, 2006

New Issue of Sacred Music: Winter 2005

The winter issue of Sacred Music, Volume 132, Number 4, is now arriving in CMAA members' mailboxes.

Features:

+ Important Notice: CanticaNOVA Publications holds the copyright to Calvert Shenk's "Complete Thy work, O Lord."

+ Editorial: "Mutatis Mutandis." A valedictory from the outgoing editor of Sacred Music, Kurt Poterack.

+ "Church Music for Larger Churches," by Duane L.C.M. Galles. A description of music in ecclesiae maiores, using examples of music at Our Lady of the Atonement in San Antonio and at Saint Agnes in Saint Paul.

+ "Gregorian Chant: The Possibilities and Conditions for a Revival," by the Reverend Monsignor Valentino Miserachs Grau, president of the Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music.

+ "Guardian of an Unique Treasure," by Dr. Michael Tunger, translated by the Reverend Robert Skeris. A reflection on the first eighty years of the Reverend Monsignor Rudolf Pohl, president of the CIMS (1985-86), by a former pupil and choirboy.

Reviews by Susan Treacy:

+ Five SATB scores by Randall Giles, Proulx, Richard Busch, Farrant (2), Hopson, and a solo by Woolen suitable for Lent and Easter from Paraclete Press, Mark Foster, and Shawnee Press.

+ Commentary on two SATB works and a solo continue "a survey of Latin sacred music by a young English composer, Nicholas Wilton."

News

Index to Volume 132


The cover photo of the issue is of the Lady Chapel at Our Lady of the Atonement (Anglican Use Latin Rite) Church in San Antonio.


Have you mailed in your annual dues? Send $30 (students: $15) payable to the Church Music Association of America in care of treasurer Mr. William Stoops at 12421 New Point Drive, Harbour Cove, Richmond, Virginia 23233.

Individual copies of Sacred Music are available for $7.50 each.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

Preparations Take Pace for 49th International Eucharistic Congress


As might be expected, the brand new official Web site of the 49th International Eucharistic Congress (2008) is very nearly blank, even in French. It is the hope of this writer that the liturgical music of this Congress be exemplary and that new (or existing!) compositions not ephemeral.

Here is a recording of music for the 48th Congress by the school of Sacred Music in Guadalajara, including the hymn from the First National Eucharistic Congress of Mexico (1924), "Cantad, cantad," and the still much-beloved hymn of the 22nd International Eucharistic Congress in Madrid (1911), "Cantemos al Amor de los amores."

Text and melody of the hymn of the 48th Congress is available here under "Himno." It has been less memorable than the former songs. Then again, one wonders how it was possible to coordinate any popular singing during the 1,500,000-member Eucharistic procession; we might easily imagine several hymns, songs, and antiphons being sung at the same time without interrupting each other.

The hymn from the 41st International Eucharistic Congress is, as readers will know, still widely sung as well.

Faithful of Campana Worried by Liturgical Abuses: Update

With reference to a previous post:

Last Friday, it was simultaneously announced in Rome and Buenos Aires that the auxiliary bishop of Mercedes-Lujan, His Excellency Oscar Domingo Sarlinga, 42, would replace His Excellency Rafael Rey as the fourth bishop of Zarate-Campana. Bishop Rey has now resigned for health reasons, according to the Agencia Informativa Catolica Argentina, which today reports that the installation of Bishop Sarlinga by the metropolitan archbishop of Buenos Aires will take place at the cathedral of Saint Florentina in Campana on Saturday the 18th.

Despite the aggressively political tone of this article in a secular news source, this appointment clearly gives the faithful of the cathedral parish new hope that their concerns will be heard.

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Copyright Office Report on Orphan Works Released

The U.S. Copyright Office released its report to the Senate Judiciary Committee on January 31, 2006. Some commentary may be found here.


CMAA Announcement List:
Email:
groups.google.com